The world's leading automated proofreading software

10 Historically Expensive Recalls in Pharma

Published By: Vineed Ravindranath

3 minutes read
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Table of Contents

1. 1997 – Wyeth-Ayerst Labs / American Home Products Corporation’s Fen-Phen (fenfluramine/phentermine) – $21 billion in losses

Though the FDA had approved the separate components of the popular appetite suppressant, the combination never received approval before hitting the market and led to one of the historically largest product liability payments.

2. 2004 – Merck’s Vioxx (rofecoxib) – $8.9 billion in losses

After 5 years on the market, the drug was discovered as leading to increased cases of stroke & heart attacks.  Almost $5 billion was awarded as settlement to patients using the drug, while legal fees continued to plague the company even up until last year.

3. 2010 – Genentech / Roche’s Avastin (bevacizumab) – $7.1 billion in losses

Though Avastin is still used to treat cases of colon, lung, kidney and brain cancers, the top-selling cancer drug was no longer approved for breast cancer patients as it was linked to a variety of life-threatening side effects (heart attack or heart failure, high blood pressure, hemorrhage, and even tears in the stomach and intestines). 

4. 2005 – Pfizer’s Bextra (valdecoxib) – $3.3 billion in losses

Bextra was approved for arthritis pain and menstrual cramps, however it had later been marketed as able to treat post-operative and other more severe pain when prescribed at higher doses.  3 weeks on the market lead to one of the largest criminal fines in U.S. history, as it was proved taking Bextra was no more effective than ibuprofen and was the cause of several adverse side-effects.

5. 1998 – Roche Laboratories – Posicor (mibefradil) – $2.9 billion in losses

Used to treat high blood pressure and angina, Posicor was pulled off the shelves in 38 countries just one year after being approved by the FDA.  Used by 400,000 people worldwide, half of which were in the U.S, this drug caused a toxic interaction with a total of 26 other drugs.

6. 2000 – Warner-Lambert’s Rezulin (troglitazone) – $2.1 billion in losses

It took only 1 year on the market to achieve sales in the billions for this diabetes treatment, however the drug was found to be connected to Hepatitis and fatal liver damage. 

7. 2001 – Bayer’s Baycol (cerivastatin) – $1.2 billion lost

After 4 years on the market, the financial damage rose to the billions for the makers of this drug used to lower cholesterol.  It was linked to over 50 deaths due to the drug causing rhabdomyolysis, which lead to renal failure.

8. 2008, 2009 & 2010 – Johnson & Johnson’s / McNeil – Various Drugs & Medical Devices– $900 million into the billions lost

J&J watched their stock prices tumble as the company suffered from a string of recalls over several consecutive years.  The recalls ranged from complaints of mildew smell coming from a variety of their drugs containers to labelling typos, as well as for replacement hips, pre-filled syringes and contact lenses.  In 2010 more than 100,000 bottles of their children medication was recalled due to a smell of mold and/or metal particles found in containers as well as irregular amounts of active or inactive ingredients.

9. 1982 – Johnson & Johnson’s Tylenol (acetaminophen) – $665 million lost

The NY Times states the tragedies resulting from cyanide being added to bottles of Tylenol caused the first voluntary recall in U.S. history.  Even though the manufacturer was not at fault, they recalled 3 million bottles.   

10. 2005 – Able Laboratories’ – Generic Prescription Drugs – $103 million lost

Unlike the companies listed above, Able Labs could not recover from the severity of their recalls.  Non-controlled manufacturing environments, fraud & misbranding bankrupted this company who annually had been grossing in the hundreds of millions from their popular generic brands.

According to Q1 2017 Pharma Recall Trends report, 18.1% of recalls were due to labelling errors.

With TVT, you can eliminate this risk. Why don’t you see it for yourself?

Do you want to find out more about how your proofreading life can be easier? Get in touch and we’ll tell you all about it.

Share this article

Vineed Ravindranath profile picture

Vineed Ravindranath

Account Executive, Schlafender Hase

Vineed is an IT sales professional with over a decade of software solutions experience.

Learn More

Subscribe to our blog

1. 1997 – Wyeth-Ayerst Labs / American Home Products Corporation’s Fen-Phen (fenfluramine/phentermine) – $21 billion in losses

Though the FDA had approved the separate components of the popular appetite suppressant, the combination never received approval before hitting the market and led to one of the historically largest product liability payments.

2. 2004 – Merck’s Vioxx (rofecoxib) – $8.9 billion in losses

After 5 years on the market, the drug was discovered as leading to increased cases of stroke & heart attacks.  Almost $5 billion was awarded as settlement to patients using the drug, while legal fees continued to plague the company even up until last year.

3. 2010 – Genentech / Roche’s Avastin (bevacizumab) – $7.1 billion in losses

Though Avastin is still used to treat cases of colon, lung, kidney and brain cancers, the top-selling cancer drug was no longer approved for breast cancer patients as it was linked to a variety of life-threatening side effects (heart attack or heart failure, high blood pressure, hemorrhage, and even tears in the stomach and intestines). 

4. 2005 – Pfizer’s Bextra (valdecoxib) – $3.3 billion in losses

Bextra was approved for arthritis pain and menstrual cramps, however it had later been marketed as able to treat post-operative and other more severe pain when prescribed at higher doses.  3 weeks on the market lead to one of the largest criminal fines in U.S. history, as it was proved taking Bextra was no more effective than ibuprofen and was the cause of several adverse side-effects.

5. 1998 – Roche Laboratories – Posicor (mibefradil) – $2.9 billion in losses

Used to treat high blood pressure and angina, Posicor was pulled off the shelves in 38 countries just one year after being approved by the FDA.  Used by 400,000 people worldwide, half of which were in the U.S, this drug caused a toxic interaction with a total of 26 other drugs.

6. 2000 – Warner-Lambert’s Rezulin (troglitazone) – $2.1 billion in losses

It took only 1 year on the market to achieve sales in the billions for this diabetes treatment, however the drug was found to be connected to Hepatitis and fatal liver damage. 

7. 2001 – Bayer’s Baycol (cerivastatin) – $1.2 billion lost

After 4 years on the market, the financial damage rose to the billions for the makers of this drug used to lower cholesterol.  It was linked to over 50 deaths due to the drug causing rhabdomyolysis, which lead to renal failure.

8. 2008, 2009 & 2010 – Johnson & Johnson’s / McNeil – Various Drugs & Medical Devices– $900 million into the billions lost

J&J watched their stock prices tumble as the company suffered from a string of recalls over several consecutive years.  The recalls ranged from complaints of mildew smell coming from a variety of their drugs containers to labelling typos, as well as for replacement hips, pre-filled syringes and contact lenses.  In 2010 more than 100,000 bottles of their children medication was recalled due to a smell of mold and/or metal particles found in containers as well as irregular amounts of active or inactive ingredients.

9. 1982 – Johnson & Johnson’s Tylenol (acetaminophen) – $665 million lost

The NY Times states the tragedies resulting from cyanide being added to bottles of Tylenol caused the first voluntary recall in U.S. history.  Even though the manufacturer was not at fault, they recalled 3 million bottles.   

10. 2005 – Able Laboratories’ – Generic Prescription Drugs – $103 million lost

Unlike the companies listed above, Able Labs could not recover from the severity of their recalls.  Non-controlled manufacturing environments, fraud & misbranding bankrupted this company who annually had been grossing in the hundreds of millions from their popular generic brands.

According to Q1 2017 Pharma Recall Trends report, 18.1% of recalls were due to labelling errors.

With TVT, you can eliminate this risk. Why don’t you see it for yourself?

Do you want to find out more about how your proofreading life can be easier? Get in touch and we’ll tell you all about it.

Subscribe to our blog

Related Blogs

Navigating Agrochemical Regulatory Compliance

September 9, 2025

Schlafender Hase Team

Navigating Agrochemical Regulatory Compliance: How to Meet Global Crop Protection Requirements

Agrochemical regulatory compliance is becoming increasingly complex. Discover how to manage evolving agrochemical regulations, improve crop protection compliance, and reduce risk.

Navigating Agrochemical Regulatory Compliance
6 minutes read

Navigating Agrochemical Regulatory Compliance: How to Meet Global Crop Protection Requirements

Agrochemical regulatory compliance is becoming increasingly complex. Discover how to manage evolving agrochemical regulations, improve crop protection compliance, and reduce risk.

FHIR ePI 101: Beginner’s Guide to e-Labeling

September 8, 2025

Schlafender Hase Team

FHIR ePI 101: A beginners guide to electronic labeling

Regulatory authorities around the world are moving toward electronic product information (ePI) built on FHIR®. But with so many acronyms, formats, and evolving requirements, it can be hard to keep up. That’s why we created FHIR ePI 101: A Beginner’s Guide to Electronic Labeling.

FHIR ePI 101: Beginner’s Guide to e-Labeling
< 1 minute read

FHIR ePI 101: A beginners guide to electronic labeling

Regulatory authorities around the world are moving toward electronic product information (ePI) built on FHIR®. But with so many acronyms, formats, and evolving requirements, it can be hard to keep up. That’s why we created FHIR ePI 101: A Beginner’s Guide to Electronic Labeling.

Ensuring Barcode Accuracy in Food Packaging

September 2, 2025

Schlafender Hase Team

Ensuring Barcode Accuracy in Food Packaging

Food packaging serves a versatile role not only in containing and protecting products but also in delivering essential information to consumers. At the same time, packaging is valuable “real estate’ with limited space. Yet consumer demand for information continues to grow and regulatory bodies require high traceability.

Ensuring Barcode Accuracy in Food Packaging
8 minutes read

Ensuring Barcode Accuracy in Food Packaging

Food packaging serves a versatile role not only in containing and protecting products but also in delivering essential information to consumers. At the same time, packaging is valuable “real estate’ with limited space. Yet consumer demand for information continues to grow and regulatory bodies require high traceability.