The world's leading automated proofreading software

10 Historically Expensive Recalls in Pharma

Published By: Vineed Ravindranath

3 minutes read
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Table of Contents

1. 1997 – Wyeth-Ayerst Labs / American Home Products Corporation’s Fen-Phen (fenfluramine/phentermine) – $21 billion in losses

Though the FDA had approved the separate components of the popular appetite suppressant, the combination never received approval before hitting the market and led to one of the historically largest product liability payments.

2. 2004 – Merck’s Vioxx (rofecoxib) – $8.9 billion in losses

After 5 years on the market, the drug was discovered as leading to increased cases of stroke & heart attacks.  Almost $5 billion was awarded as settlement to patients using the drug, while legal fees continued to plague the company even up until last year.

3. 2010 – Genentech / Roche’s Avastin (bevacizumab) – $7.1 billion in losses

Though Avastin is still used to treat cases of colon, lung, kidney and brain cancers, the top-selling cancer drug was no longer approved for breast cancer patients as it was linked to a variety of life-threatening side effects (heart attack or heart failure, high blood pressure, hemorrhage, and even tears in the stomach and intestines). 

4. 2005 – Pfizer’s Bextra (valdecoxib) – $3.3 billion in losses

Bextra was approved for arthritis pain and menstrual cramps, however it had later been marketed as able to treat post-operative and other more severe pain when prescribed at higher doses.  3 weeks on the market lead to one of the largest criminal fines in U.S. history, as it was proved taking Bextra was no more effective than ibuprofen and was the cause of several adverse side-effects.

5. 1998 – Roche Laboratories – Posicor (mibefradil) – $2.9 billion in losses

Used to treat high blood pressure and angina, Posicor was pulled off the shelves in 38 countries just one year after being approved by the FDA.  Used by 400,000 people worldwide, half of which were in the U.S, this drug caused a toxic interaction with a total of 26 other drugs.

6. 2000 – Warner-Lambert’s Rezulin (troglitazone) – $2.1 billion in losses

It took only 1 year on the market to achieve sales in the billions for this diabetes treatment, however the drug was found to be connected to Hepatitis and fatal liver damage. 

7. 2001 – Bayer’s Baycol (cerivastatin) – $1.2 billion lost

After 4 years on the market, the financial damage rose to the billions for the makers of this drug used to lower cholesterol.  It was linked to over 50 deaths due to the drug causing rhabdomyolysis, which lead to renal failure.

8. 2008, 2009 & 2010 – Johnson & Johnson’s / McNeil – Various Drugs & Medical Devices– $900 million into the billions lost

J&J watched their stock prices tumble as the company suffered from a string of recalls over several consecutive years.  The recalls ranged from complaints of mildew smell coming from a variety of their drugs containers to labelling typos, as well as for replacement hips, pre-filled syringes and contact lenses.  In 2010 more than 100,000 bottles of their children medication was recalled due to a smell of mold and/or metal particles found in containers as well as irregular amounts of active or inactive ingredients.

9. 1982 – Johnson & Johnson’s Tylenol (acetaminophen) – $665 million lost

The NY Times states the tragedies resulting from cyanide being added to bottles of Tylenol caused the first voluntary recall in U.S. history.  Even though the manufacturer was not at fault, they recalled 3 million bottles.   

10. 2005 – Able Laboratories’ – Generic Prescription Drugs – $103 million lost

Unlike the companies listed above, Able Labs could not recover from the severity of their recalls.  Non-controlled manufacturing environments, fraud & misbranding bankrupted this company who annually had been grossing in the hundreds of millions from their popular generic brands.

According to Q1 2017 Pharma Recall Trends report, 18.1% of recalls were due to labelling errors.

With TVT, you can eliminate this risk. Why don’t you see it for yourself?

Do you want to find out more about how your proofreading life can be easier? Get in touch and we’ll tell you all about it.

Share this article

Vineed Ravindranath profile picture

Vineed Ravindranath

Account Executive, Schlafender Hase

Vineed is an IT sales professional with over a decade of software solutions experience.

Learn More

Subscribe to our blog

1. 1997 – Wyeth-Ayerst Labs / American Home Products Corporation’s Fen-Phen (fenfluramine/phentermine) – $21 billion in losses

Though the FDA had approved the separate components of the popular appetite suppressant, the combination never received approval before hitting the market and led to one of the historically largest product liability payments.

2. 2004 – Merck’s Vioxx (rofecoxib) – $8.9 billion in losses

After 5 years on the market, the drug was discovered as leading to increased cases of stroke & heart attacks.  Almost $5 billion was awarded as settlement to patients using the drug, while legal fees continued to plague the company even up until last year.

3. 2010 – Genentech / Roche’s Avastin (bevacizumab) – $7.1 billion in losses

Though Avastin is still used to treat cases of colon, lung, kidney and brain cancers, the top-selling cancer drug was no longer approved for breast cancer patients as it was linked to a variety of life-threatening side effects (heart attack or heart failure, high blood pressure, hemorrhage, and even tears in the stomach and intestines). 

4. 2005 – Pfizer’s Bextra (valdecoxib) – $3.3 billion in losses

Bextra was approved for arthritis pain and menstrual cramps, however it had later been marketed as able to treat post-operative and other more severe pain when prescribed at higher doses.  3 weeks on the market lead to one of the largest criminal fines in U.S. history, as it was proved taking Bextra was no more effective than ibuprofen and was the cause of several adverse side-effects.

5. 1998 – Roche Laboratories – Posicor (mibefradil) – $2.9 billion in losses

Used to treat high blood pressure and angina, Posicor was pulled off the shelves in 38 countries just one year after being approved by the FDA.  Used by 400,000 people worldwide, half of which were in the U.S, this drug caused a toxic interaction with a total of 26 other drugs.

6. 2000 – Warner-Lambert’s Rezulin (troglitazone) – $2.1 billion in losses

It took only 1 year on the market to achieve sales in the billions for this diabetes treatment, however the drug was found to be connected to Hepatitis and fatal liver damage. 

7. 2001 – Bayer’s Baycol (cerivastatin) – $1.2 billion lost

After 4 years on the market, the financial damage rose to the billions for the makers of this drug used to lower cholesterol.  It was linked to over 50 deaths due to the drug causing rhabdomyolysis, which lead to renal failure.

8. 2008, 2009 & 2010 – Johnson & Johnson’s / McNeil – Various Drugs & Medical Devices– $900 million into the billions lost

J&J watched their stock prices tumble as the company suffered from a string of recalls over several consecutive years.  The recalls ranged from complaints of mildew smell coming from a variety of their drugs containers to labelling typos, as well as for replacement hips, pre-filled syringes and contact lenses.  In 2010 more than 100,000 bottles of their children medication was recalled due to a smell of mold and/or metal particles found in containers as well as irregular amounts of active or inactive ingredients.

9. 1982 – Johnson & Johnson’s Tylenol (acetaminophen) – $665 million lost

The NY Times states the tragedies resulting from cyanide being added to bottles of Tylenol caused the first voluntary recall in U.S. history.  Even though the manufacturer was not at fault, they recalled 3 million bottles.   

10. 2005 – Able Laboratories’ – Generic Prescription Drugs – $103 million lost

Unlike the companies listed above, Able Labs could not recover from the severity of their recalls.  Non-controlled manufacturing environments, fraud & misbranding bankrupted this company who annually had been grossing in the hundreds of millions from their popular generic brands.

According to Q1 2017 Pharma Recall Trends report, 18.1% of recalls were due to labelling errors.

With TVT, you can eliminate this risk. Why don’t you see it for yourself?

Do you want to find out more about how your proofreading life can be easier? Get in touch and we’ll tell you all about it.

Subscribe to our blog

Related Blogs

How FMCG and CPG Companies Can Improve Regulatory Risk Management for Packaging

June 12, 2025

Schlafender Hase Team

How FMCG and CPG Companies Can Improve Regulatory Risk Management for Packaging

In the rapidly changing and highly competitive Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) sector, labeling and packaging plays an important role in brand identity, over and above its purpose of protecting the physical product.

How FMCG and CPG Companies Can Improve Regulatory Risk Management for Packaging
5 minutes read

How FMCG and CPG Companies Can Improve Regulatory Risk Management for Packaging

In the rapidly changing and highly competitive Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) sector, labeling and packaging plays an important role in brand identity, over and above its purpose of protecting the physical product.

E-labeling and what it means for regulatory teams

May 29, 2025

Schlafender Hase Team

RAPS Webinar: e-Labeling and what it means for Regulatory Teams

E-labeling is no longer a future concept. Regulatory agencies worldwide, including the EMA, FDA, and MHRA, are advancing digital product information initiatives. But what does this mean for your daily work as a regulatory professional? How will your submission and labeling processes change? And how can you prepare today to avoid last-minute compliance risks?

E-labeling and what it means for regulatory teams
2 minutes read

RAPS Webinar: e-Labeling and what it means for Regulatory Teams

E-labeling is no longer a future concept. Regulatory agencies worldwide, including the EMA, FDA, and MHRA, are advancing digital product information initiatives. But what does this mean for your daily work as a regulatory professional? How will your submission and labeling processes change? And how can you prepare today to avoid last-minute compliance risks?

Press Release Cloud Native TVT

May 28, 2025

Schlafender Hase Team

Schlafender Hase Brings Pharma-Level content review and compliance to the CPG Industry with a new cloud-native version of TVT

TVT, Schlafender Hase’s flagship software, has long been the trusted standard for document and label review in the pharmaceutical industry. The new cloud-native version builds on the same proven comparison engine at the core of the desktop product. With a responsive web interface, scalable microservices architecture, and standards-based RESTful APIs, it delivers enhanced flexibility, intuitive usability, and seamless integration with existing document and artwork management systems, making world-class quality control more accessible to CPG teams.

Press Release Cloud Native TVT
2 minutes read

Schlafender Hase Brings Pharma-Level content review and compliance to the CPG Industry with a new cloud-native version of TVT

TVT, Schlafender Hase’s flagship software, has long been the trusted standard for document and label review in the pharmaceutical industry. The new cloud-native version builds on the same proven comparison engine at the core of the desktop product. With a responsive web interface, scalable microservices architecture, and standards-based RESTful APIs, it delivers enhanced flexibility, intuitive usability, and seamless integration with existing document and artwork management systems, making world-class quality control more accessible to CPG teams.