The world's leading automated proofreading software

10 Historically Expensive Recalls in Pharma

Published By:

Vineed Ravindranath
3 minutes read
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Table of Contents

1. 1997 – Wyeth-Ayerst Labs / American Home Products Corporation’s Fen-Phen (fenfluramine/phentermine) – $21 billion in losses

Though the FDA had approved the separate components of the popular appetite suppressant, the combination never received approval before hitting the market and led to one of the historically largest product liability payments.

2. 2004 – Merck’s Vioxx (rofecoxib) – $8.9 billion in losses

After 5 years on the market, the drug was discovered as leading to increased cases of stroke & heart attacks.  Almost $5 billion was awarded as settlement to patients using the drug, while legal fees continued to plague the company even up until last year.

3. 2010 – Genentech / Roche’s Avastin (bevacizumab) – $7.1 billion in losses

Though Avastin is still used to treat cases of colon, lung, kidney and brain cancers, the top-selling cancer drug was no longer approved for breast cancer patients as it was linked to a variety of life-threatening side effects (heart attack or heart failure, high blood pressure, hemorrhage, and even tears in the stomach and intestines). 

4. 2005 – Pfizer’s Bextra (valdecoxib) – $3.3 billion in losses

Bextra was approved for arthritis pain and menstrual cramps, however it had later been marketed as able to treat post-operative and other more severe pain when prescribed at higher doses.  3 weeks on the market lead to one of the largest criminal fines in U.S. history, as it was proved taking Bextra was no more effective than ibuprofen and was the cause of several adverse side-effects.

5. 1998 – Roche Laboratories – Posicor (mibefradil) – $2.9 billion in losses

Used to treat high blood pressure and angina, Posicor was pulled off the shelves in 38 countries just one year after being approved by the FDA.  Used by 400,000 people worldwide, half of which were in the U.S, this drug caused a toxic interaction with a total of 26 other drugs.

6. 2000 – Warner-Lambert’s Rezulin (troglitazone) – $2.1 billion in losses

It took only 1 year on the market to achieve sales in the billions for this diabetes treatment, however the drug was found to be connected to Hepatitis and fatal liver damage. 

7. 2001 – Bayer’s Baycol (cerivastatin) – $1.2 billion lost

After 4 years on the market, the financial damage rose to the billions for the makers of this drug used to lower cholesterol.  It was linked to over 50 deaths due to the drug causing rhabdomyolysis, which lead to renal failure.

8. 2008, 2009 & 2010 – Johnson & Johnson’s / McNeil – Various Drugs & Medical Devices– $900 million into the billions lost

J&J watched their stock prices tumble as the company suffered from a string of recalls over several consecutive years.  The recalls ranged from complaints of mildew smell coming from a variety of their drugs containers to labelling typos, as well as for replacement hips, pre-filled syringes and contact lenses.  In 2010 more than 100,000 bottles of their children medication was recalled due to a smell of mold and/or metal particles found in containers as well as irregular amounts of active or inactive ingredients.

9. 1982 – Johnson & Johnson’s Tylenol (acetaminophen) – $665 million lost

The NY Times states the tragedies resulting from cyanide being added to bottles of Tylenol caused the first voluntary recall in U.S. history.  Even though the manufacturer was not at fault, they recalled 3 million bottles.   

10. 2005 – Able Laboratories’ – Generic Prescription Drugs – $103 million lost

Unlike the companies listed above, Able Labs could not recover from the severity of their recalls.  Non-controlled manufacturing environments, fraud & misbranding bankrupted this company who annually had been grossing in the hundreds of millions from their popular generic brands.

According to Q1 2017 Pharma Recall Trends report, 18.1% of recalls were due to labelling errors.

With TVT, you can eliminate this risk. Why don’t you see it for yourself?

Do you want to find out more about how your proofreading life can be easier? Get in touch and we’ll tell you all about it.

Share this article

1. 1997 – Wyeth-Ayerst Labs / American Home Products Corporation’s Fen-Phen (fenfluramine/phentermine) – $21 billion in losses

Though the FDA had approved the separate components of the popular appetite suppressant, the combination never received approval before hitting the market and led to one of the historically largest product liability payments.

2. 2004 – Merck’s Vioxx (rofecoxib) – $8.9 billion in losses

After 5 years on the market, the drug was discovered as leading to increased cases of stroke & heart attacks.  Almost $5 billion was awarded as settlement to patients using the drug, while legal fees continued to plague the company even up until last year.

3. 2010 – Genentech / Roche’s Avastin (bevacizumab) – $7.1 billion in losses

Though Avastin is still used to treat cases of colon, lung, kidney and brain cancers, the top-selling cancer drug was no longer approved for breast cancer patients as it was linked to a variety of life-threatening side effects (heart attack or heart failure, high blood pressure, hemorrhage, and even tears in the stomach and intestines). 

4. 2005 – Pfizer’s Bextra (valdecoxib) – $3.3 billion in losses

Bextra was approved for arthritis pain and menstrual cramps, however it had later been marketed as able to treat post-operative and other more severe pain when prescribed at higher doses.  3 weeks on the market lead to one of the largest criminal fines in U.S. history, as it was proved taking Bextra was no more effective than ibuprofen and was the cause of several adverse side-effects.

5. 1998 – Roche Laboratories – Posicor (mibefradil) – $2.9 billion in losses

Used to treat high blood pressure and angina, Posicor was pulled off the shelves in 38 countries just one year after being approved by the FDA.  Used by 400,000 people worldwide, half of which were in the U.S, this drug caused a toxic interaction with a total of 26 other drugs.

6. 2000 – Warner-Lambert’s Rezulin (troglitazone) – $2.1 billion in losses

It took only 1 year on the market to achieve sales in the billions for this diabetes treatment, however the drug was found to be connected to Hepatitis and fatal liver damage. 

7. 2001 – Bayer’s Baycol (cerivastatin) – $1.2 billion lost

After 4 years on the market, the financial damage rose to the billions for the makers of this drug used to lower cholesterol.  It was linked to over 50 deaths due to the drug causing rhabdomyolysis, which lead to renal failure.

8. 2008, 2009 & 2010 – Johnson & Johnson’s / McNeil – Various Drugs & Medical Devices– $900 million into the billions lost

J&J watched their stock prices tumble as the company suffered from a string of recalls over several consecutive years.  The recalls ranged from complaints of mildew smell coming from a variety of their drugs containers to labelling typos, as well as for replacement hips, pre-filled syringes and contact lenses.  In 2010 more than 100,000 bottles of their children medication was recalled due to a smell of mold and/or metal particles found in containers as well as irregular amounts of active or inactive ingredients.

9. 1982 – Johnson & Johnson’s Tylenol (acetaminophen) – $665 million lost

The NY Times states the tragedies resulting from cyanide being added to bottles of Tylenol caused the first voluntary recall in U.S. history.  Even though the manufacturer was not at fault, they recalled 3 million bottles.   

10. 2005 – Able Laboratories’ – Generic Prescription Drugs – $103 million lost

Unlike the companies listed above, Able Labs could not recover from the severity of their recalls.  Non-controlled manufacturing environments, fraud & misbranding bankrupted this company who annually had been grossing in the hundreds of millions from their popular generic brands.

According to Q1 2017 Pharma Recall Trends report, 18.1% of recalls were due to labelling errors.

With TVT, you can eliminate this risk. Why don’t you see it for yourself?

Do you want to find out more about how your proofreading life can be easier? Get in touch and we’ll tell you all about it.

Related Blogs

September 27, 2024

Schlafender Hase Team

Understanding Document Comparison Software: A Key Tool for Regulatory Affairs in Crop Science

Much like in the pharmaceutical and medical device sectors, where the adoption of such software has proven to reduce workloads and the risk of errors that may cause recalls or stop-sales, the Crop Science industry is also beginning to recognize the value of integrating this technology.

4 minutes read

Understanding Document Comparison Software: A Key Tool for Regulatory Affairs in Crop Science

Much like in the pharmaceutical and medical device sectors, where the adoption of such software has proven to reduce workloads and the risk of errors that may cause recalls or stop-sales, the Crop Science industry is also beginning to recognize the value of integrating this technology.

September 23, 2024

Schlafender Hase Team

The Rise of Regulatory Requirements for Medical Devices

Peter Muller & Mike Baird of Schlafender Hase how well they think suppliers are adapting to new regulatory demands for Class 2 and 3 Medical Device Manufacturers.

4 minutes read

The Rise of Regulatory Requirements for Medical Devices

Peter Muller & Mike Baird of Schlafender Hase how well they think suppliers are adapting to new regulatory demands for Class 2 and 3 Medical Device Manufacturers.

September 23, 2024

Schlafender Hase Team

From Struggles to Solutions – Leveraging Technology for Faster Labeling Review in Crop Science

Across the Crop Science sector, both user and environmental safety are of highest priority. In this buyer’s guide, we will go over seven steps that will help you in your purchasing process, to ensure that you end up with the proofreading software you need.

< 1 minute read

From Struggles to Solutions – Leveraging Technology for Faster Labeling Review in Crop Science

Across the Crop Science sector, both user and environmental safety are of highest priority. In this buyer’s guide, we will go over seven steps that will help you in your purchasing process, to ensure that you end up with the proofreading software you need.